We use cookies and similar technologies on our website. Some of them are essential, while others support us by enhancing the website and user experience. Personal data ( e.g. IP addresses) could be processed, e.g. for personalized ads and content or user metrics. Further information about the usage of your data can be found in our Privacy Policy. You can edit or revoke your choice anytime by clicking on the "Manage cookies" link in the footer of any page.
20
Commentaires (28)
Ajouter commentaires Page 1 2 3Member
My advice is to try to teach you, your views, not trying to teach me, what is the logic?
I don't know what you're trying to tell me.
Because of language barriers, communication difficulties, sorry....
an yong chen, au 21. October 2010 aviser repondre applause 0
Member
My advice is to try to teach you, your views, not trying to teach me, what is the logic?
I don't know what you're trying to tell me.
I have said the nuclear pollution is the greatest enemy of mankind,
Reasonable use of nuclear energy does not include nuclear weapons, and the largest nuclear contamination caused by nuclear war.
Ok then, nuclear waste is bad, thank you. Sorry, we're talking in circles...
prinzparadox, au 20. October 2010 aviser repondre applause 0
Member
But you are against education, your point of view contradictory, it appears now you are talking like a running chicken without a head.
Wrong. I'm not against education, I am against educating other people my opinion in their heads. And I'm against any nuclear stuff, will it be waste or weapons. I'm just realistic and think that the Western World can't live without nuclear energy in the next 30 years.
My advice is to try to teach you, your views, not trying to teach me, what is the logic?
I have said the nuclear pollution is the greatest enemy of mankind,
Reasonable use of nuclear energy does not include nuclear weapons, and the largest nuclear contamination caused by nuclear war.
an yong chen, au 19. October 2010 aviser repondre applause 0
Member
But you are against education, your point of view contradictory, it appears now you are talking like a running chicken without a head.
Wrong. I'm not against education, I am against educating other people my opinion in their heads. And I'm against any nuclear stuff, will it be waste or weapons. I'm just realistic and think that the Western World can't live without nuclear energy in the next 30 years.
prinzparadox, au 18. October 2010 aviser repondre applause 0
Member
Please. Don't try to teach me, that's useless. I know what could happen.
I like your cartoon, but don't tell me the stuff I learned in 4th grade in school. Now you are talking like a running chicken without a head. Science can probably solve the toxic waste problem one day, that's what I'm talking about.
Scientists is the result of education, since you believe scientists to show that you still believe in education. But you are against education, your point of view contradictory, it appears now you are talking like a running chicken without a head.
an yong chen, au 13. October 2010 aviser repondre applause 0
Member
Debate between us is the expression of different opinions, if you think dissent is education, then you first tried to educate me. So, you think that expression of opinion, is equivalent to education, is a logical confusion.
Of course, dissent is education, but I'm not interested in educating. Dissent and exchange of opinions lead to new experiences, that's some sort of education for me. Expression of opinion is no education, just the exchange.
Chen, we think the same... mostly.
prinzparadox, au 13. October 2010 aviser repondre applause 0
Member
Please. Don't try to teach me, that's useless. I know what could happen.
I like your cartoon, but don't tell me the stuff I learned in 4th grade in school. Now you are talking like a running chicken without a head. Science can probably solve the toxic waste problem one day, that's what I'm talking about.
Debate between us is the expression of different opinions, if you think dissent is education, then you first tried to educate me. So, you think that expression of opinion, is equivalent to education, is a logical confusion.
an yong chen, au 13. October 2010 aviser repondre applause 0
Member
If nuclear war breaks out, its nuclear contamination would be devastating, no scientist can save you, because they can not even save themselves.
Please. Don't try to teach me, that's useless. I know what could happen.
I like your cartoon, but don't tell me the stuff I learned in 4th grade in school. Now you are talking like a running chicken without a head. Science can probably solve the toxic waste problem one day, that's what I'm talking about.
prinzparadox, au 12. October 2010 aviser repondre applause 0
Member
Medi Belortaja, au 11. October 2010 aviser repondre applause 0
Member
Debate is very stimulating.
My view is that human beings can only react when he is driven into the abyss.
The question is: In such condition; will there be time to redirect things?
ALEX gb, au 11. October 2010 aviser repondre applause 0
Ajouter commentaires